These sorts of pattern-and-practice investigations usually result in court-approved agreements between federal prosecutors and native governments, meant to information a metropolis’s police drive via a technique of thorough reform. This may almost certainly be performed via a settlement settlement, referred to as a consent decree, guaranteeing motion to finish illegal practices inside the division.
Below President Donald Trump, the Justice Division had stopped utilizing consent decrees to drive reforms at police departments, however final week, Garland restored them.
Dennis Kenney, a professor of felony justice at John Jay Faculty and a former police officer, stated that because the Justice Division undertakes a assessment of Minneapolis’s policing, it might almost certainly be seeking to take reform in two instructions: proscribing the allowable use of drive, and growing accountability for law enforcement officials accused of wrongdoing.
Whereas the Obama administration stepped up the usage of consent decrees towards metropolis police departments, Kenney described the investigation into Minneapolis’s division — and, doubtlessly, others sooner or later — as a chance to reimagine policing on a brand new stage.
“They should set up with the neighborhood what the principles of police-citizen engagement are going to be, when can the police work together, what’s the expectations on them and on the town,” he stated. “That must be collaboratively determined, and only a few locations have performed that.”